The government wants to promote self. Why not! This decision is double-edged …

We are increasingly involved in our health.

Internet sites abound on health, demonstrating the interest of public health issues. So indeed, why not self …

A recent American study showed that Google was a remarkable doctor, since the search engine “diagnosed” in 80% of cases the disease before it through various symptoms.

Self or “Loto medication?

However, it is not reassuring to encourage people to engage in self. When consult her doctor? Might there not to see patients diagnosed very late after playing too well in the sorcerer’s apprentice? What the authorities have control over what people do to their health? The door is open to many abuses. Once some have tasted the joys of self-medication (Loto Medication?), It will be difficult to stop them “prescribe” miracle medicines sold on the net without supervision.

And then I’m intrigued by the gap between the pragmatic vision of health embodied self (allow self is tolerate some risk to realize substantial savings), another, much more cautious on osteopathy (and osteopathy, all non-medical techniques: Reflexology, Reiki, shiatsu, etc.)

Asking people to treat just one side, and prohibit the other practitioners who are trained (usually long), who join federations representative, practice their technique with the sole purpose of the reserve physiotherapists and doctors (which generally are less well trained in such techniques) is inconsistent.